Satoshi Nakamoto and the Civil-War Within Bitcoin

  1. source
  • description
  • source

    description

    this video is brought to you by

    skillshare

    hi welcome to another episode of cold

    fusion before we get started

    i just want to say thank you to everyone

    who joined the discord i know it was a

    bit chaotic to begin with but we’ve got

    some moderators in there now and it’s

    calmed down

    thanks to those of you who are willing

    to help alright so on to the video

    in the previous episode we took a look

    at how cryptocurrencies were born in the

    1980s

    and then we followed their underground

    struggle in the 1990s

    a group of individuals risked prison

    time because they believed in total

    financial freedom from the government

    today we’ll dive into the civil war in

    the modern bitcoin community

    and see how some believe that the

    cryptocurrency has been co-opted by

    banking interests

    and lastly we’ll take a look at some

    theories into who satoshi nakamoto may

    be

    let’s begin you are watching cold fusion

    tv

    one of the first things you need to

    understand to grasp the modern state of

    bitcoin

    is the block size wars as we discussed

    in the last episode

    bitcoin is mined in blocks these blocks

    contain a record of all the most recent

    transactions

    the size of these blocks measured in

    megabytes have a meaningful

    impact in the way that bitcoin functions

    satoshi originally placed a one megabyte

    block size limit on bitcoin

    so why did he do this well satoshi

    didn’t want some miner on the network to

    create a huge block

    terabytes in size that could clog up the

    entire system

    as time went on this one megabyte block

    size limit

    made bitcoin hard to scale as more users

    came online

    as more people used the bitcoin system

    payment times became longer

    and fees became higher even to date

    bitcoin can only do about 7 transactions

    per second

    for context paypal does about 15 and

    visa

    2 000 transactions per second

    but satoshi knew this was coming and in

    his original writings he remarked

    that bitcoin would be updated with

    larger block sizes

    as it scaled so here’s where the issue

    arises

    there was a fundamental split in the

    community it was over the question of if

    bitcoin was a long-term store of value

    like gold or a quick medium of exchange

    like cash within the bitcoin developer

    community

    so-called big blockers wanted bigger

    block sizes

    so more transactions could take place

    this would make bitcoin function closer

    to a method of payment and electronic

    cash

    on the other side of the aisle was the

    small blockers they saw bitcoin as a

    store of value

    so transaction speed and efficiency

    didn’t matter as much

    in their eyes the original one megabyte

    limit was fine

    why risk messing with it according to

    the small blockers

    having large blocks would make it hard

    for some computers to handle

    they stated that eventually only large

    companies with powerful computers would

    dominate the network

    forming a monopoly in 2015

    gavin anderson whom satoshi left in

    charge after vanishing

    and a google developer by the name of

    mike hearn would team up together to

    tackle this problem

    their solution was the release of

    bitcoin xt

    equipped with a two megabyte block size

    that was set to increase over time

    and capable of 24 transactions per

    second it looked promising

    and the miners in the community were on

    board if the majority of the bitcoin

    community

    downloaded the bitcoin xt software and

    decided to run it on their nodes

    the community would have voted with

    their machines and the issue would have

    been settled

    but there was strong opposition the

    small blockers saw this as a betrayal

    the technical experts should determine

    the direction of bitcoin

    and not a populist campaign from here

    things got bizarre strangely due to a

    multitude of reasons

    and some possible foul play bitcoin xt

    ultimately didn’t reach mass adoption

    garnered a lot of support a lot of

    miners especially were like hey

    this is great i would love to mine

    bigger blocks there’s more money

    in a bigger block for me so why would i

    not go that direction

    well all of a sudden dos attacks

    tons of data is pushed across a network

    forcing a node to crash

    mike’s entire regional isp was dos

    attack for days

    all of these xt nodes got pushed off the

    network only isps where xt nodes existed

    were

    were dos attacked strangely

    online the main reddit bitcoin forum

    would ban anyone that talked about

    bitcoin xt

    mike hearn in 2016 stated quote

    why has bitcoin failed it has failed

    because community has failed

    what was meant to be a new decentralized

    form of money

    that lacked systematically important

    institutions and too big to fail

    has become something even worse a system

    completely controlled by just a handful

    of people

    end quote there was now some obvious

    contention within the bitcoin community

    within the community of bitcoin

    developers the search to fix the scaling

    problem was still taking place

    the idea of a segwit or segregated

    witness was introduced

    activated in 2017 its aim was to store

    transaction data in a smarter way

    so more data could fit onto a given

    block

    basically they removed the cryptographic

    signature from the block

    only leaving the receiver and sender

    information

    this process made room for more data

    in august of 2017 some bitcoin

    developers

    weren’t happy with the proposed segway

    method so they worked on a new version

    of bitcoin

    and split it off from the main chain a

    process known as a hard fork

    the result was bitcoin cash bitcoin cash

    had none of the data saving techniques

    of segwit

    and an increased block size of 8

    megabytes

    at this point things start getting a

    little messy after some time

    the developers of bitcoin cash wanted to

    include even more changes

    a man by the name of craig wright

    thought that this would cause bitcoin to

    stray from its original purpose

    interestingly some people believe that

    craig wright

    is satoshi but more on him later

    in 2018 craig led the charge to split

    from bitcoin cash into what would be

    called

    bitcoin satoshi vision or bitcoin sv for

    short

    it has no block size limit and features

    super low transaction fees

    there is a belief among the bitcoin

    satoshi vision community

    that bitcoin sv is the real bitcoin

    according to them bitcoin sv is

    technically superior to the mainstream

    bitcoin

    and it can do more than 2 000 times the

    amount of transactions per second

    it’s more flexible yet only trades at a

    small fraction of the price

    on the other side of the fence the

    entity coin geek currently controls over

    51

    of the computing power available for

    mining bitcoin sv

    which critics say can lead to

    manipulation

    others such as vitalik the creator of

    ethereum calls bitcoin sv

    a complete scam like obviously vsp is a

    complete scam

    so as it stands today due to infighting

    and differing opinions

    bitcoin is split into three the

    mainstream bitcoin

    bitcoin cash and bitcoin satoshi vision

    but what if all of this fracturing

    should have never happened

    what if there was more going on behind

    the scenes

    in 2014 while the scaling problems were

    being discussed in full swing

    a company by the name of blockstream was

    founded

    the stated purpose of blockstream was to

    quote

    sell sidechains to enterprises charging

    a fixed monthly fee

    and taking transaction fees in other

    words

    its aim was to relieve the stress on the

    bitcoin network by doing transactions

    off-chain

    and pocketing the fees instead of miners

    it’s important to note

    that a side chain is not a blockchain at

    all side chains are typically used

    to patch holes in the capabilities of

    the underlying protocol

    therefore the better bitcoin becomes the

    more obsolete

    companies like blockstream get in my

    opinion it was in blockstream’s

    interest to keep bitcoin slow and

    therefore with a small block size

    [Music]

    it’s worth noting that blockstream isn’t

    a foundation

    but a for-profit corporation

    interestingly

    blockstream’s ceo is adam back who some

    also believe is satoshi nakamoto but

    more on this later

    during the researching for this video i

    could see that a large part of the

    bitcoin community was suspicious of

    block stream

    many take issue with blockstream’s

    lightning network for example

    it promises to boost bitcoin’s

    transactional speeds to faster than visa

    but at what cost

    the original bitcoin system promised no

    middlemen

    and no trust required suddenly

    the blockstream corporation had broken

    these promises

    so the lightning hubs were required to

    be set up for financial regulation

    and reporting laws require massive

    amounts of liquidity to keep multiple

    well-funded open channels

    offer fraud departments to watch the

    blockchain constantly and prevent theft

    all while taking small fees for every

    transaction you route through them

    does this system sound familiar

    just replace the term open channel

    with checking account these lightning

    network hubs

    will be ran by the same financial

    institutions the bitcoin was made to

    challenge

    the banks aren’t fighting bitcoin

    because bitcoin

    will be the new banking system bitcoin

    needed no middleman

    there was no fraud to detect no

    permission to give no transaction to

    reverse

    no fees to collect so it had to be

    broken to need them

    the truth is the one megabyte blocks

    restricting bitcoin

    are purposely kept there by the

    developers the absurdly high fees

    and long waits created demand for a

    solution and the solution they give us

    is the banking industry

    to make things worse the entities

    funding blockstream

    are antithetical to the original bitcoin

    vision blockstream has received

    55 million dollars of investment from

    axa insurance

    the ceo of axa at the time was henry de

    castris

    a french billionaire and the president

    of the bilderberg group at the time

    a group known to have global banking and

    corporate ties

    critics also point out that blockstream

    has received funding from the digital

    currency group

    many higher-ups within the company have

    ties to the federal reserve

    world bank and mastercard not exactly

    the crowd who you would expect to

    spearhead a grassroots movement

    they also own coindesk one of the

    biggest news outlets in the crypto space

    adam back has also been criticized for

    hiring all the early bitcoin devs into

    blockstream

    to reshape the bitcoin protocol to many

    it seems that blockstream has crippled

    bitcoin’s full potential

    through their group of developers only

    to seek to fix its shortcomings

    for a profit so through block stream

    have the banks taken over bitcoin

    it’s not quite a smoking gun but it’s

    all very curious

    satoshi nakamoto the pseudonym for the

    inventor of bitcoin

    has gone to great lengths to hide his

    identity he created an anonymous email

    account

    and never shared any personal details

    he’s left

    such few clues that the best one can do

    is point out the facts that lead to the

    most likely candidates and then i’ll

    leave it up to you to make up your own

    mind

    firstly for nakamoto we need to lay some

    groundwork with two basic clues

    number one bitcoin’s original code was

    written in the programming language

    c plus number two

    satoshi had two language quirks he would

    use british english over american

    english

    and consistently used two spaces after a

    period

    this common writing style hints that

    satoshi is not a group but a single

    person

    our first candidate isn’t the most

    serious but he’s worth mentioning

    because he ties into our second

    candidate

    the least likely candidate is dorian

    nakamoto

    a japanese-american physicist and

    engineer in 2014

    a newsweek article published a photo of

    him as well as his home which could be

    easily found

    via a google search the article claimed

    that he was the founder of bitcoin

    solely due to his name basically lazy

    journalism

    when accused nakamoto stated that he had

    never heard of bitcoin before and it

    would seem completely strange that

    someone as obsessed with cryptography

    and anonymity would just

    go ahead and use their legal name as an

    alias

    but the main reason i’m here is to

    clear my name that i have nothing to do

    with bitcoin

    nothing to do with developing um

    i was just an engineer doing something

    else that’s not me

    i never communicated with bitcoins okay

    the media attention dorian received was

    unnecessary and dangerous

    thankfully the bitcoin community came to

    dorian’s aid and collectively donated

    102 bitcoins

    a donation now worth close to 5 million

    dollars

    [Music]

    as we saw in episode 1 satoshi didn’t

    work alone

    he worked closely with hal finney a

    cryptographer and part of the cypherpunk

    movement

    before going public satoshi spent a year

    and a half coding

    sharing his work privately among a

    select few

    hal finney would also receive the very

    first bitcoin transaction

    coincidentally hal lived just down the

    road from dorian nakamoto

    perhaps they had bumped into each other

    and hal decided to use nakamoto’s name

    as an

    alias in 2009

    hau was diagnosed with als this

    coincides with when satoshi would slow

    down posting in email forums

    on the flip side if he was testing code

    for satoshi why would he put bugs on his

    own code and then solved them himself

    in hindsight with bitcoin’s popularity

    one might think that it was a

    sophisticated ploy to throw people off

    the scent

    but you must remember these were the

    earliest days of bitcoin and it could

    have flopped over and disappeared a week

    from then

    for all they knew this would suggest

    that it wasn’t him

    howard post as himself on other forums

    and even on his deathbed he denied being

    satoshi and even stated that he didn’t

    really understand bitcoin at first

    sadly hal finney died in 2014

    and was cryogenically frozen he decided

    that he wanted to be cryogenically

    frozen

    because one day he still wanted to see

    the future since we’re still talking

    about him today

    in a way he’s made it

    the next candidate is our old friend

    nick zabo

    he’s a first generation hungarian and

    his father fought in the 1956 hungarian

    revolution

    nick would have a unique perspective on

    governments abusing their power

    he has a computer science degree from

    the university of washington

    and was proficient in law and economics

    as you saw throughout the previous

    episode nick has been an active

    participant in almost every stage of

    cryptocurrency history

    and was close to a complete breakthrough

    with his invention of bit gold

    zabo had also worked for david charms

    digicash an early attempt to bring

    cryptocurrency digital payments

    he has the knowledge experience and a

    decade’s long passion for cryptography

    based money

    he’s even credited with pioneering the

    concept for smart contracts in the 1996

    paper

    before bitcoin wallets were used the

    protocol was to use ip addresses to send

    bitcoin to each other

    satoshi’s ip address was in california

    and nick

    did indeed work in the area what i find

    most interesting

    is that there was an exchange between

    satoshi and another cryptographer

    in the exchange satoshi remarked that

    his bitcoin address

    also happened to have his initials in it

    looking through all of the initials

    combinations

    out of all the candidates that could be

    satoshi only one of the initials match

    n s although these initials could just

    be satoshi nakamoto reversed

    on the opposing side though nick zabo

    has denied satoshi claims

    in addition bitcoin was coded in c-plus

    plus

    and wei dai the inventor of b-money

    states that nick

    didn’t code much in c or c-plus plus

    nick also doesn’t match the british

    linguistic clues

    [Music]

    craig wright is probably the most

    controversial of the bunch

    he’s a well-accomplished australian

    scientist who also holds a bunch of

    other degrees

    he was first accused of being nakamoto

    in 2015.

    the difference between him and the other

    suspected founders

    is that while denying it first he

    eventually claimed the accusations to be

    true

    greg anderson who worked closely with

    satoshi believed craig was the real deal

    after craig performed a digital

    signature on an address known to be

    owned by satoshi

    craig would also fit the british english

    clue because both australian and british

    english

    are pretty much interchangeable wired

    magazine had collected a number of

    interesting coincidences that led them

    to their conclusion

    they include posts on wright’s blog that

    coincide and predict

    the release of the initial bitcoin paper

    there is also said to be leaked

    correspondences between

    wright and attorneys where he states

    that he’s been running bitcoin since

    on the flip side it wasn’t long before

    wyatt and the crypto community

    began pointing out inconsistencies in

    craig’s story

    the timeline became even more blurry

    when new evidence seemed to prove that

    craig’s blog post had been backdated

    and i don’t work and invent and

    write papers and code by coming in front

    of tvs

    i don’t want money i don’t want fame i

    don’t want adoration i just want to be

    left alone

    you come in front of my camera once

    and i will never ever be on a camera

    ever again

    for any tv station or any media

    everyone’s saying

    i don’t ever want to be in the public

    again you know you followed my family

    you bothered me you’ve got the people i

    work with

    this will be the last time that you ever

    see me those words from your mouth

    television one that was an

    hour interview that was cut and changed

    but you’ll find out important

    are you sufficient yes okay

    so you wrote the satoshi white paper yes

    you’re only a public figure because you

    cosplay

    right

    [Music]

    it also seems unlikely that nakamoto

    would spend

    seven years being anonymous just to take

    credit when accused

    further in 2020 craig wright had

    provided a list of early bitcoin

    addresses which he claimed to own in an

    ongoing court case

    these addresses were briefly

    inadvertently made public 145 of these

    addresses were used by an

    individual who did own them to sign a

    public message to prove

    that craig was not the owner the message

    read

    quote craig stephen wright is a liar

    and a fraud he doesn’t have the keys to

    sign this message

    this was a major blow to the theory that

    craig was satoshi

    but many bitcoin sv supporters

    wholeheartedly believe

    that craig is satoshi

    thanks to a 2020 documentary by the

    youtube channel

    barely sociable the most recent

    candidate during the rounds is adam back

    adam ticks the majority of the boxes and

    seems almost a perfect match

    apart from one thing but more on this

    later

    adam was an early pioneer in digital

    currency research along with everyone in

    episode 1

    wei dai david charm and hal finney

    adam has a phd in distributed computer

    systems

    a perfect match in 1997 he invented

    hashcash

    a similar system is used in the

    proof-of-work mining algorithm in

    bitcoin

    both satoshi and adam wrote in british

    english and used the unique double

    spacing in writing

    this can be seen by comparing adam’s

    writings and forums with satoshi’s

    papers

    satoshi never showed any emotion or

    clues into his personality

    but in one post in july of 2010 he

    described that bitcoin was

    quote bloody hard to describe and that’s

    a very british thing to say

    other evidence that points to adamus

    satoshi is the fact that messages

    between the creator of bitcoin and adam

    are not available to the public

    there exists email exchanges between

    satoshi and almost everyone else apart

    from adam

    in addition adam codes very well in c

    plus

    the same language that bitcoin was

    written in

    in the first episode we saw that the

    first block of bitcoin

    included a headline from the times paper

    the times is a british publication which

    would make sense because adam was from

    london

    adam was also known for starting the

    trend of making political statements in

    code

    he printed it on a t-shirt and then so

    if people flew

    internationally with that t-shirt on

    then they were breaking this law

    is that the case i don’t know i mean

    if you can export a book can you export

    a t-shirt at a sub of a gray area i

    guess but

    at least it it people thought it was an

    amusing

    kind of way to protest something that

    they were quite unhappy about in 2013

    when the wealth of nakamoto was revealed

    in a blog article adam registers to sign

    up to the bitcoin forum on the very same

    day

    in forum posts adam states that the blog

    authors are

    quote getting too close to the dealings

    of nakamoto

    despite only just joining the forum he

    knows obscure details of early bitcoin

    bugs that were never public in change

    logs

    if you’re interested in digging more

    into adam check out barely social’s

    youtube documentary it has some

    compelling arguments

    but adam would deny all claims made in

    the video

    and for me though there’s one thing that

    stops me from believing satoshi is adam

    if satoshi’s vision for bitcoin was to

    have ever increasing block sizes

    why would adam through blockstream be

    actively trying to keep bitcoin’s block

    size small

    for a profit why would adam want any

    money at all

    he’d probably be one of the richest

    people in the world if he was satoshi

    am i missing something here the only

    thing i can think of

    is maybe adam worked extremely close

    with satoshi but for one reason or

    another

    ended up selling out to the big banks

    so who is satoshi i’ll be honest

    i’m stumped for this one if you guys

    think you have any clues for me

    hit up my discord maybe we can

    crowdsource this thing together and

    figure it out

    i’ve set up a new text channel for the

    discussion around satoshi

    in truth discovering the identity of

    satoshi nakamoto is not necessary for

    the success of bitcoin

    he or she could be one of these

    candidates or

    just someone who is truly unknown until

    this day

    and with that that pretty much brings us

    to the end of our bitcoin series

    in part one you saw how free thinkers

    took digital cryptography seriously in

    the 80s and 90s

    their efforts allowed bitcoin to exist

    in this episode

    you saw that the story of bitcoin may

    not be as simple as it first

    seems in the end another cryptocurrency

    may come and take its place as the

    global leader

    no matter what happens bitcoin will

    always be known

    as the pioneer

    if you enjoyed learning some new things

    in this episode then you’ll probably

    like today’s sponsor

    skillshare an online learning community

    i’ve been watching real productivity

    create your ideal week by michael khan

    janna procorn

    the co-founder and ceo of skillshare he

    has a lot of simple but great tips to

    get the most out of your day and keep

    your motivation high

    for an example putting an imaginary cost

    on the things that you do often

    so you can prioritize your time if you

    just want self-improvement

    or are keen on expanding your creativity

    skillshare is a great place to do that

    the first 1000 people to click the link

    below get a free trial of a skillshare

    premium membership

    so thanks for watching the whole way

    through this episode be sure to check

    out the first part of this series if you

    haven’t already i’ll leave a link for

    that below

    anyways my name is tagogo and you’ve

    been watching cold fusion

    next time we’ll take a look at the rise

    and fall

    of atari cheers

    [Music]

    oh